Immigration views resist pandemic and political pressure in Europe

Survey data show European attitudes to immigration stayed stable or even improved after COVID-19, with few exceptions.

As European leaders wrangle over a common migration and asylum policy, recent data from the European Social Survey (ESS) reveals that public attitudes towards immigration remain stable or even improved after the COVID-19 pandemic  

Despite record numbers of arrivals across the Mediterranean and growing pressure from far-right parties ahead of national and EU elections. Opinions however remain polarised across countries. 

This study is based on ESS, one of the most comprehensive cross-national and repeated studies of public attitudes in Europe and compares responses from 13 countries before and after the pandemic.  

The long-term trend of improving attitudes toward immigrants appears unaffected by crises such as the health emergency. Improving attitudes toward immigrants can be explained by the reduced salience of immigration in public debate, overshadowed by the health and economic emergency.  

Despite initial fears of rising xenophobia, the pandemic pushed immigration out of the spotlight, contributing to more positive public attitudes. 

Individual factors remain central 

The most influential predictors of immigration attitudes are education and life satisfaction. Respondents with higher levels of education and life satisfaction tend to express more positive views towards immigration. This trend remains consistent across most of the surveyed countries. 

Being a woman is positively associated with more favorable attitudes toward immigrants. Unsurprisingly, having a migrant background strongly boosts positive views on immigration  

Context still matters 

While individual factors are important, the study underscores that national context continues to shape immigration attitudes in powerful ways.  

The strength of media and political narratives appears to be a key factor. Countries where mainstream parties have adopted more inclusive rhetoric – often tied to economic arguments or humanitarian values – tend to show more stable or improving attitudes. Conversely, where anti-immigration messages have dominated political discourse, public opinion remains more negative. 

COVID-19’s limited effect 

The pandemic does not appear to have significantly altered European attitudes towards immigration. While the early stages of COVID-19 saw a rise in nationalism and border closures, these developments did not translate into a widespread hardening of public opinion. 

By contrast, positive trends emerged in countries like Bulgaria, Italy, and Slovakia, where immigration became less prominent in public debate following the pandemic outbreak. 

The role of media and discourse 

Media coverage and political messaging remain key factors shaping public perceptions. The study shows that attitudes are more positive when integration policies reflect a more inclusive vision of the nation. Negative coverage—focusing on crime, cultural conflict, or welfare dependency—tends to correlate with more hostile views 

This effect is particularly strong in countries with polarised media environments. In Italy and France, for instance, diverging narratives across media outlets appear to contribute to a fragmented public opinion landscape, with significant differences between urban and rural populations. 

Policy implications 

The persistence of polarised attitudes has implications for European policymakers, especially as the EU moves forward with plans for a new migration and asylum pact. Understanding that public opinion is shaped by both structural factors and narrative framing could inform more effective communication strategies. 

Some experts argue that focusing on integration outcomes, rather than simply arrival numbers, may help shift the conversation. Highlighting success stories and the contributions of migrants in healthcare, agriculture, and technology sectors could counterbalance more negative portrayals. 

At the same time, efforts to address the root causes of anxiety – such as economic insecurity and housing shortages– are seen as crucial to creating a more receptive environment for inclusive policies. 

A complex picture 

This study confirms that immigration remains a politically sensitive and socially complex issue across Europe. While fears of a dramatic post-pandemic backlash have not materialised, neither has there been a significant surge in pro-immigration sentiment. 

Instead, public attitudes appear to be shaped by a combination of long-standing individual characteristics and evolving national contexts.  

As Europe faces new migration challenges – from climate displacement to geopolitical instability – the findings suggest that public opinion will remain a critical, but not necessarily predictable, factor in shaping the continent’s future migration policies. 

Veronica Riniolo is Assistant Professor at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (Milan). She is member of the Scientific Committee of the Italian team of the European Values Study (EVS) and of the World Values Survey (WVS). She is member of the Scientific Board of the International Federation of Catholic Universities. Her main research interests focus on citizens’ attitudes towards immigration, youth with a migrant background, youth political participation, and discrimination of ethnic minorities,  

Vera Lomazzi is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Bergamo. She is member of the Executive Committee of the European Values Study and member of the Scientific Committee of the Italian team of the European Values Study (EVS) and of the World Values Survey (WVS). She is board member of the European Survey Research Association (ESRA). Her research focuses on the cross-cultural study of gender equality and gender norms, European values, and survey research methods. 

Originally published under Creative Commons by 360info™.